From lucene-dev Mon Feb 14 19:07:11 2005 From: Daniel Naber Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:07:11 +0000 To: lucene-dev Subject: Re: BitSet implementation and large index Message-Id: <200502142007.11652 () danielnaber ! de> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=lucene-dev&m=110841051625148 On Monday 14 February 2005 16:29, tony@simpleobjects.com wrote: > It seems that for a huge index, it might be a good idea to use a > different implementation of the BitSet when doing filtering (assuming > the non-filtered set is relatively small).  This would really help > minimize the memory required for each filter operation. This already exists: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32921 Regards Daniel -- http://www.danielnaber.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org