[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lua-l
Subject:    Re: TypedLua
From:       steve donovan <steve.j.donovan () gmail ! com>
Date:       2014-02-28 6:41:28
Message-ID: CA+ZMS_tm=WotuoZzuuPL9PHWf-y0BQbyi85ANZoZPPXdSRBDtA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 5:13 AM, Andrew Starks <andrew.starks@trms.com> wrote:
> It's one of those things that comes up and I have this thought. When I do,
> I'm never left thinking that there are a ton of ways to extend value types.
> I'm always left thinking, "any one of these ways would be fine and if there
> was just one, things could be much easier to parse."

Well, 'extended types' are concepts built on the lower-level Lua
mechanisms, and like 'class' implementations, there will always be
multiple ways of achieving that. It would be useful if we had a
virtual summit meeting and established some conventions, but it's hard
for cats to herd.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]