[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ltp-list
Subject:    Re: [LTP] [YEAR END ANALYSIS] Where we stand ??
From:       Daniel Gollub <dgollub () suse ! de>
Date:       2008-12-22 11:54:28
Message-ID: 200812221254.29893.dgollub () suse ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

On Monday 22 December 2008 08:10:13 Subrata Modak wrote:
> Hello Everybody,
>
> Apolozise to intrude in your Christmas & New Year celebrations with an
> awkward subject in the mail. But, nevertheless this is necessary. We are
> about to close our 2008 activities shortly, and, itś time for our own
> introspection. I would like to know from all of you how we did in 2008
> after re-inventing ourselves in early 2007. There are certain things
> depending on which our next course of actions/activities will be
> determined:
>
> 1) How many kernel issues (Bugs in code/documentation/etc) did LTP tests
> help to uncover ?? This statistics is absolutely necessary for us, as
> our primary goal is to test the kernel. And this statistics will point
> us to the grey areas, or, things which need urgent attention. It would
> be great if you can share such information.
> 2) Did we uncover issues in other libraries/manpages/etc while working
> with the tests themselves ?? In other words, while testing through LTP,
> did we enrich some other project(s) ?
[...]

A few i remember which need to get fixed in other project and got spotted by 
LTP:

Various issues in libnuma compatibility layer for libnuma V1, spotted by 
testcases/kernel/numa:
ftp://oss.sgi.com/www/projects/libnuma/download/CHANGES
(fixed in libnuma 2.0.3-rc1)

Wrong glibc fortify-check, spotted by getgroups4 testcase:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6980

best regards,
Daniel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]