From ltp-list Mon Dec 22 11:54:28 2008 From: Daniel Gollub Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:54:28 +0000 To: ltp-list Subject: Re: [LTP] [YEAR END ANALYSIS] Where we stand ?? Message-Id: <200812221254.29893.dgollub () suse ! de> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=ltp-list&m=122995043002193 On Monday 22 December 2008 08:10:13 Subrata Modak wrote: > Hello Everybody, > > Apolozise to intrude in your Christmas & New Year celebrations with an > awkward subject in the mail. But, nevertheless this is necessary. We are > about to close our 2008 activities shortly, and, itś time for our own > introspection. I would like to know from all of you how we did in 2008 > after re-inventing ourselves in early 2007. There are certain things > depending on which our next course of actions/activities will be > determined: > > 1) How many kernel issues (Bugs in code/documentation/etc) did LTP tests > help to uncover ?? This statistics is absolutely necessary for us, as > our primary goal is to test the kernel. And this statistics will point > us to the grey areas, or, things which need urgent attention. It would > be great if you can share such information. > 2) Did we uncover issues in other libraries/manpages/etc while working > with the tests themselves ?? In other words, while testing through LTP, > did we enrich some other project(s) ? [...] A few i remember which need to get fixed in other project and got spotted by LTP: Various issues in libnuma compatibility layer for libnuma V1, spotted by testcases/kernel/numa: ftp://oss.sgi.com/www/projects/libnuma/download/CHANGES (fixed in libnuma 2.0.3-rc1) Wrong glibc fortify-check, spotted by getgroups4 testcase: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6980 best regards, Daniel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list