[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-crypto
Subject:    RE: EVMS and LOOP-AES
From:       "IT3 Stuart Blake Tener, USNR-R" <stuart () bh90210 ! net>
Date:       2002-03-31 16:43:23
[Download RAW message or body]

Mr. Ruusu:

	Correct me if I am wrong, but if loop-aes were integrated into
EVMS, would that not make creating an encrypted swap quite easy?


Very Respectfully, 

Stuart Blake Tener, IT3 (E-4), USNR-R, N3GWG 
Beverly Hills, California
VTU 1904G (Volunteer Training Unit) 
stuart@bh90210.net 
west coast: (310)-358-0202 P.O. Box 16043, Beverly Hills, CA 90209-2043 
east coast: (215)-338-6005 P.O. Box 45859, Philadelphia, PA 19149-5859 

Telecopier: (419)-715-6073 fax to email gateway via www.efax.com (it's
free!) 

JOIN THE US NAVY RESERVE, SERVE YOUR COUNTRY, AND BENEFIT FROM IT ALL. 

Sunday, March 31, 2002 8:39 AM


-----Original Message-----
From: root@monster.misty.com [mailto:root@monster.misty.com] On Behalf
Of Jari Ruusu
Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 8:17 AM
To: stuart@bh90210.net
Cc: linux-crypto@nl.linux.org
Subject: Re: EVMS and LOOP-AES

"IT3 Stuart Blake Tener, USNR-R" wrote:
>         I understand that their implementation is inclusive of a
> "plugin" type of style for adding features. Would it be okay if I
asked
> them to review the code you have written to see if they could adapt it
> to be a plug in for EVMS in the future (i.e. adapt loop-aes for EVMS)?
> Of course, I am not sure (but I presume) that this is the sensible way
> to implement a mix of these technologies.

loop-AES and cryptoapi's cryptoloop are stacking devices and they can be
used on top of EVMS or LVM just fine. No need to shoehorn them into
EVMS.

Regards,
Jari Ruusu <jari.ruusu@pp.inet.fi>

-
Linux-crypto:  cryptography in and on the Linux system
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]