[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: linux-arm-kernel
Subject: Re: 2.6 module loader in 2.4?
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux () arm ! linux ! org ! uk>
Date: 2004-12-02 16:20:59
Message-ID: 20041202162059.A7767 () flint ! arm ! linux ! org ! uk
[Download RAW message or body]
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 04:22:59PM +0100, Matthias Welwarsky wrote:
> did (just by chance) anybody look into backporting the 2.6 module loader code
> into 2.4? Is it self-contained enough to try?
The concise answer: no, because it's pointless.
Of course, you could take a 2.6 kernel and edit the top level makefile to
give it a 2.4 version number - that's probably the quickest and easiest
way to achieve your goal.
Otherwise, you have the replacement module infrastructure for linking,
plus the changes to the module code, changes to the _way_ module use
counting works, all the buggy drivers which use MOD_INC_USE_COUNT,
the build infrastructure and so forth. To backport the module loader
into 2.4 you're essentially looking at what I mention in my second
paragraph.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscription options: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
FAQ: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/armlinux/mlfaq.php
Etiquette: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/armlinux/mletiquette.php
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic