[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lilypond-user
Subject:    Re: Using \after 8 \turn with beamed notes when stem is up produces a turn under the beam
From:       David Kastrup <dak () gnu ! org>
Date:       2023-06-25 16:37:22
Message-ID: 87edlzmrb1.fsf () fencepost ! gnu ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Kieren MacMillan <kieren@kierenmacmillan.info> writes:

> Hi David,
>
>> whether the one-dimensional outside-staff-priority system
>> is even well-suited for expressing the desired rules/constraints
>
> Are you able to say a little more about what you're thinking there?
> (The meaning I infer is that a two-dimensional system could allow for
> a L/R priority, which is a long-standing feature wish of mine —
> somewhere in the list archives are examples of me asking whether,
> e.g., tempo markings and rehearsal marks could automatically "slide"
> left or right instead of just up and down.)

I was not thinking in spatial dimensions.

Maybe "linear" or "well-ordered" would have been a better expression.
The priority system essentially states the order of type X and type Y
independent of whether a grob of type Z needs to be accommodated as
well.

-- 
David Kastrup

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]