[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lids-user
Subject:    Re: [lids-user] lids=0
From:       "Sander Klein" <roedie () roedie ! nl>
Date:       2006-06-07 14:54:38
Message-ID: 2608.80.126.29.2.1149692078.squirrel () www ! roedie ! nl
[Download RAW message or body]

Hey,

Now I wonder, is this by design? Because lidsadm -I is in my init scripts
so it will automagicaly go to POSTBOOT state. I could ofcourse just modify
the script that it doesn't do that when lids=0 is given.... But I was just
wondering if this was expected behaviour...

Greets,

Sander

On Wed, June 7, 2006 3:24, Kazuki Omo said:
> Hi, Sander,
>
>> When booting my kernel with lids=0 my ACL's stay in effect. Has anyone
>> else experienced this?
>
> Your ACL will stay in effect in BOOT state?
>
> In my environment, LIDS will not be in effect when I use "lids=0"
> option with lids kernel. But lids will effect when I move
> the system to POSTBOOT state by "lidsadm -I" command.
>
> Regards,
>
> OMO
>
> On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 09:57:49PM +0200, Sander Klein wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think I've tripped on a bug.
>>
>> When booting my kernel with lids=0 my ACL's stay in effect. Has anyone
>> else experienced this?
>>
>> I'm using lids 2.2.2 and lidstools 2.2.7. I did patch lids 2.2.2 against
>> linux-2.6.16.18 tho... I'll try and test if the problem als exists in
>> linux-2.6.14.
>>
>> Greets,
>>
>> Sander KLein
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lids-user mailing list
>> lids-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lids-user
>>
>
> --
> Kazuki Omo: omok@honto.info
> LIDS Japanese Information:
> Japanese: http://www.selinux.gr.jp/LIDS-JP/index.html
> English:  http://www.selinux.gr.jp/LIDS-JP/LIDS_en/index.html
>
>




_______________________________________________
lids-user mailing list
lids-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lids-user
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]