[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lartc
Subject:    Re: [LARTC] Does IPV6 support HTB?
From:       Alan Ford <alan () whirlnet ! co ! uk>
Date:       2004-03-26 14:34:46
Message-ID: 20040326143446.GF3133 () newred ! gradwell ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 06:24:16PM +0000, Alan Ford wrote:
> Well, almost. There seem to be rather a lot of issues if trying
> to mix "protocol ip" and "protocol ipv6" in filters. 

I've done some more experimentation with this, and so long as commands
are entered in the right order it seems fairly happy.

The one thing you *cannot* do is mix "protocol ip" and "protocol ipv6"
filters for filtering into a class. The second filter request returns
with "Invalid argument".

This is really rather inconvenient. Does anybody know why?

I wondered if I could get around this by not specifying a protocol at
all, i.e.:
    tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 prio 10 handle 10 fw flowid 1:10
But all it returns with is:
    RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument

Is it possible to do a fwmark match without a protocol? Or is there any
other way around my problem?

Thanks,
Alan
-- 
Alan Ford * alan@whirlnet.co.uk 
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]