[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kwrite-devel
Subject:    Re: Review Request 114395: add partial RST support to cmake.xml
From:       Dominik Haumann <dhaumann () kde ! org>
Date:       2013-12-16 21:03:39
Message-ID: 1623572.mPWHcnLC40 () eriador
[Download RAW message or body]

On Monday 16 December 2013 15:37:30 Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> On 2013-12-16 15:27, Dominik Haumann wrote:
> > On Monday 16 December 2013 15:16:19 Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> >> On 2013-12-16 12:07, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> >>> (Actually, I'll go ahead and push everything to
> >>> mwoehlke/cmake-3.0-syntax-support but not update the review yet pending
> >>> your thoughts on the above.)
> > 
> > You could add a cmake3.xml file and make sure it has lower priority than
> > cmake.xml.
> 
> Yes, that could work. But then, when do the two get merged / switched?
> Probably we would not want to maintain two separate syntax files forever
> and would eventually want the 3.0 version to be the default.
> 
> Worth noting; it's not expected that there will be significant
> incompatible changes. (And the bracketing stuffs are entirely a new
> syntax that just wouldn't be used with 2.x.)

I'd suggest you talk to Alex or Steve. If it's backwards compatible, I see no 
reason to just have one cmake.xml that supports both.

> >> Apparently kde git does not allow force-pushing / deleting of even
> >> "personal" branches? Is it possible to lift that restriction?
> >> 
> >> (Else there is now "permanently" a version of this that isn't what I
> >> actually want to go to master :-(.)
> > 
> > I have no idea. Ask the sysadmins?
> 
> Sure; wanted to know if there is anything policy-wise that would be
> specific to the kate repo first...

Again: no idea ;)

Greetings,
Dominik
_______________________________________________
KWrite-Devel mailing list
KWrite-Devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kwrite-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]