[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kwrite-devel
Subject:    Re: Re: Vi Mode Bar => Status-Bar
From:       Sven Brauch <svenbrauch () googlemail ! com>
Date:       2013-04-03 12:16:52
Message-ID: CAE_ay6ks-MhRp_jsFVwzv+jV7PKmGx0FvnA1z-KrvYm_6E8L2g () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

> 1st) Not getting complaints does (unfortunately) not imply that the solution
> is perfect. So this alone is a very weak argument.
Agreed. :)

> 2nd) To sum up: KDevelop does not have a status bar to save space.
> Interestingly, Kate Part has to add the status bar in vi-mode, otherwise
> KDevelop does not have a status bar. So you don't want a status bar while
> at the same time wanting a status bar. Do you see the irony? :-)
Heh, yeah, I guess it's sort of unnoticed because none of the people
which work on kdevelop regularily use vi mode (afaik).

> From a Kate developers pov, this means that the code/solution in Kate Part is
> not as it should be (more code to maintain), which is something I (personally)
> never like that much.
I see the problem. I'll talk to people about it.

Cheers,
Sven
_______________________________________________
KWrite-Devel mailing list
KWrite-Devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kwrite-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]