[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kopete-devel
Subject:    [kopete-devel] Re: Current status of KOS/ICQ integration
From:       Richard Smith <kde () metafoo ! co ! uk>
Date:       2005-06-12 17:38:05
Message-ID: 200506121838.06227.kde () metafoo ! co ! uk
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sunday 12 June 2005 18:27, Matt Rogers wrote:
> On Saturday 11 June 2005 12:05 pm, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > The weight of the FFC status should stay bigger than the one of online.
> > So contact that are free for chat appears before in the contactlist.
>
> why? In ICQ, Free for Chat means that you are available for other people to
> pull you into other chatrooms and is not really a desirable status.

If we're ordering statuses by desirability, I think Out to Lunch should go 
above Online. :)

If we're ordering them by how available you are, Free for Chat should go above 
Online.

Otherwise, what are we ordering them by?
-- 
Thanks,
Richard
_______________________________________________
kopete-devel mailing list
kopete-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]