From kopete-devel Sun Jun 12 17:38:05 2005 From: Richard Smith Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 17:38:05 +0000 To: kopete-devel Subject: [kopete-devel] Re: Current status of KOS/ICQ integration Message-Id: <200506121838.06227.kde () metafoo ! co ! uk> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kopete-devel&m=111859789325262 On Sunday 12 June 2005 18:27, Matt Rogers wrote: > On Saturday 11 June 2005 12:05 pm, Olivier Goffart wrote: > > The weight of the FFC status should stay bigger than the one of online. > > So contact that are free for chat appears before in the contactlist. > > why? In ICQ, Free for Chat means that you are available for other people to > pull you into other chatrooms and is not really a desirable status. If we're ordering statuses by desirability, I think Out to Lunch should go above Online. :) If we're ordering them by how available you are, Free for Chat should go above Online. Otherwise, what are we ordering them by? -- Thanks, Richard _______________________________________________ kopete-devel mailing list kopete-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel