[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    RE: kword/demos and kword.dtd
From:       Nicolas Goutte <nicog () snafu ! de>
Date:       2001-04-26 20:47:16
[Download RAW message or body]

From what I know, nobody has ever said that kword.dtd was either complete or fully correct!

Have a nice day/evening/night!

-----Original Message-----
From:	Stephan Kulow [SMTP:coolo@kde.org]
Sent:	Thursday, April 26, 2001 6:01 PM
To:	koffice-devel@kde.org
Subject:	kword/demos and kword.dtd

Hi!

I tried xmllint on chapters.kwd and found it's old :)
Then I opened and saved it and found this. Similiar errors I got for 
DTPTest. Is the DTD supposed to say what a valid kword document is?

Greetings, Stephan

chapters2.kwd:8: validity error: Element FRAME doesn't carry attribute 
newFrameBehaviour
AME runaround="1" right="566" left="28" bottom="798" runaroundGap="2" top="42"
                                                                              
^
chapters2.kwd:8: validity error: Element FRAME doesn't carry attribute 
autoCreateNewFrame
AME runaround="1" right="566" left="28" bottom="798" runaroundGap="2" top="42"
                                                                              
^
chapters2.kwd:14: validity error: No declaration for attribute customdef on 
element COUNTER
"1" bulletfont="symbol" righttext="." type="1" start="1" depth="0" 
customdef=""
                                                                              
^

flatland.kwd:20: validity error: Element OFFSETS doesn't carry attribute after
     <OFFSETS before="8.50395" />

-- 
People in cars cause accidents. Accidents in cars cause people.
_______________________________________________
Koffice-devel mailing list
Koffice-devel@master.kde.org
http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel

_______________________________________________
Koffice-devel mailing list
Koffice-devel@master.kde.org
http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]