[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: part of kformula
From:       Ulrich Kuettler <ulrich.kuettler () mailbox ! tu-dresden ! de>
Date:       2001-03-06 14:28:11
[Download RAW message or body]

On Monday 05 March 2001 16:26, David Faure wrote:
> On Monday 05 March 2001 10:19, Ulrich Kuettler wrote:
> 
> > Now we would like to know the needs of kword/kspread and whoever wants to
> > use the lib. The question is how the interface should look like, whether
> > there should be actions inside the lib and so on.
>
> Oh, forgot to comment on that.
> I think actions would be a good idea - it would prevent each application
> from having to define them. Of course it's still up to the application to
> define those actions in its XML, but at least the action creation and
> connections etc. would already be done in the lib (in some initialization
> method).
>

Ok, I moved the specific actions into the lib. See 
KFormulaContainer::createActions. But what to do about the icons? Right now 
the icons are in the parts directory and it works. Does the framework look in 
the libs directory for the icons, too? I don't want to move the part's icons 
because I want to use the old lib's ones which are already there.

Another thing: I wonder whether it is a good thing to have KFormulaWidget 
being a QWidget. It makes sense for the part but do you want to have a new 
widget for every formula in kword?

Uli
_______________________________________________
Koffice-devel mailing list
Koffice-devel@master.kde.org
http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]