[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: Changes to koffice/lib/store
From:       David Faure <david () mandrakesoft ! com>
Date:       2000-11-17 0:05:35
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thursday 16 November 2000 23:40, Shaheed Haque wrote:
> Sorry my note was not clearer...I meant relative cwd as you describe. But, 
> you did get my main point that this (a) involves an API change and (b) 
> involves changes to kostore.

Ok, I see. Maybe that's also why I was a bit against this change initially :-)

> Am I wrong to think that the equivalent API change to the filters is a more 
> straighforward solution (and does not add state to kostore)? Why is this not 
> a better approach?

You mean in olefilters ? I think it's a better idea, yes.
Other (simpler) filters don't usually have embedded objects,
and other complex filters (Lotus etc.) don't exist yet... :)

-- 
David FAURE, david@mandrakesoft.com, faure@kde.org
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~david/, http://www.konqueror.org/
KDE, Making The Future of Computing Available Today
See http://www.kde.org/kde1-and-kde2.html for how to set up KDE 2

_______________________________________________
Koffice-devel mailing list
Koffice-devel@master.kde.org
http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]