On Thursday 16 November 2000 23:40, Shaheed Haque wrote:
> Sorry my note was not clearer...I meant relative cwd as you describe. B=
ut,=20
> you did get my main point that this (a) involves an API change and (b)=20
> involves changes to kostore.

Ok, I see. Maybe that's also why I was a bit against this change initiall=
y :-)

> Am I wrong to think that the equivalent API change to the filters is a =
more=20
> straighforward solution (and does not add state to kostore)? Why is thi=
s not=20
> a better approach?

You mean in olefilters ? I think it's a better idea, yes.
Other (simpler) filters don't usually have embedded objects,
and other complex filters (Lotus etc.) don't exist yet... :)

--=20
David FAURE, david@mandrakesoft.com, faure@kde.org
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~david/, http://www.konqueror.org/
KDE, Making The Future of Computing Available Today
See http://www.kde.org/kde1-and-kde2.html for how to set up KDE 2

_______________________________________________
Koffice-devel mailing list
Koffice-devel@master.kde.org
http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel