[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: Substitute for the MSOOXML concept of Comments
From:       Carlos Licea <carlos_licea () hotmail ! com>
Date:       2010-07-15 19:57:26
Message-ID: 201007151357.27150.carlos_licea () hotmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Jueves 15 Julio 2010 12:54:01 Jaroslaw Staniek escribió:
> On 15 July 2010 19:39, Carlos Licea <carlos_licea@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm very pleased you are in favor of this proposal. However, I do find it
> > odd, after all what we are going to do is no longer valid ODF, it seems
> > to me that you were more concerned with interoperability with OOo rather
> > than ODF in general.
> 
> "Valid odf" was used here a few times. Side note, could someone clarify:
> isn't allowing custom namespaces the purpose of going with XML from
> the very beginning?
That's just what I thought, the whole point was that we could agree on some 
basic functionality as a foundation and then on top add our own tags (music 
shape, anyone?.)

I think that the intention of "valid" was "file that only contains elements 
defined by the standard." But yet again, we should be free to expand the 
standard.
-- 
Carlos Licea
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]