[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: Review Request: Lock shape shouldn't be selectable
From:       Jan Hambrecht <jaham () gmx ! net>
Date:       2009-04-20 8:19:42
Message-ID: 49EC301E.4080001 () gmx ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

Thomas Zander wrote:
> On Sunday 19. April 2009 23:17:36 Jan Hambrecht wrote:
>> I agree about the different needs of different applications. I think it
>> would work having locked shapes not to be selectable in karbon. The only
>> issue i see with that is consistency between applications.
> 
> What about the issue that you need to select a shape in order to mark it 
> not-locked ?

The user can still click on the locked icon in the docker.
> 
> Can you say what the usecase is of having a single object being locked and not 
> selectable?  I'm not sure I see your reasoning.

Well that was Cyrilles idea and i think he has explained why.

> Maybe its useful to make the UI call both setLocked(true) and 
> setSelectable(false) in your usecase?

Yeah that is what i meant. :-)

> 
> If I use karbon now the main usecases I know of are solved with locking the 
> layer. Is that not enough?

Because a more fine grained control for that would be more usable. I
think layer based locking is a bit too coarse grained.

Ciao Jan
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]