[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: koffice-devel
Subject: Re: GSoC 2009 proposal, looking for mentor
From: Sven Langkamp <sven.langkamp () gmail ! com>
Date: 2009-02-27 0:59:32
Message-ID: 478b087a0902261659m5740ea5bie2c5e554a304c528 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Andrew Dorrell
<andrew.dorrell@gmail.com>wrote:
> Andrew Dorrell wrote:
> > LukasT.dev@gmail.com wrote:
> >>> I'd like to put in a vote for the diffusion curves. That stuff is
> >>> very cool and looks very powerful for content creation. Also it is
> >>> nice and modular (self contained project). But I would contact the
> >>> authors first to clarrify their position WRT intellectual property.
> >>> I.e. Have they, or are they planning to patent this work and how
> >>> will they view a GPLv3 release of their work.
> >>>
> >> I already mailed long time ago with one of the authors of curves and
> >> the author showed some joy over the fact, that somebody wants to
> >> implement in open-source project. No problems with patent I think.
> >>
> >
> > That's fantastic to know. BTW I think it could fit in both karbon14
> > and krita but in krita it would be used as a kind of brush so that,
> > when you had finished using the tool it rendered to pixels and that
> > was that. In karbon14 it makes sense to retain the curve definition
> > and re-generate as required - retaining full scalability.
> >
> > I must get to know these apps a little better!
> >
>
> BTW... Does KDE have or use a particular core image processing library?
> By image processing I mean things like convolution and morphological
> filters, edge detectors, colour transforms... that kind of thing.
Not really. KDE mainly uses what Qt provides, which is just very basic
stuff.
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Andrew Dorrell <span \
dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:andrew.dorrell@gmail.com">andrew.dorrell@gmail.com</a>></span> \
wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, \
204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <div class="Ih2E3d">Andrew \
Dorrell wrote:<br> > <a \
href="mailto:LukasT.dev@gmail.com">LukasT.dev@gmail.com</a> wrote:<br> >>> \
I'd like to put in a vote for the diffusion curves. That stuff is<br> \
>>> very cool and looks very powerful for content creation. Also it is<br> \
>>> nice and modular (self contained project). But I would contact the<br> \
>>> authors first to clarrify their position WRT intellectual property.<br> \
>>> I.e. Have they, or are they planning to patent this work and how<br> \
>>> will they view a GPLv3 release of their work.<br> >>><br>
>> I already mailed long time ago with one of the authors of curves and<br>
>> the author showed some joy over the fact, that somebody wants to<br>
>> implement in open-source project. No problems with patent I think.<br>
>><br>
><br>
> That's fantastic to know. BTW I think it could fit in both karbon14<br>
> and krita but in krita it would be used as a kind of brush so that,<br>
> when you had finished using the tool it rendered to pixels and that<br>
> was that. In karbon14 it makes sense to retain the curve definition<br>
> and re-generate as required - retaining full scalability.<br>
><br>
> I must get to know these apps a little better!<br>
><br>
<br>
</div>BTW... Does KDE have or use a particular core image processing library?<br>
By image processing I mean things like convolution and morphological<br>
filters, edge detectors, colour transforms... that kind of \
thing.</blockquote><div><br>Not really. KDE mainly uses what Qt provides, which is \
just very basic stuff. <br></div></div><br>
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic