[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: Migration from KOffice 1 to KOffice 2
From:       Lorenzo Villani <lvillani () binaryhelix ! net>
Date:       2009-02-19 16:46:58
Message-ID: 200902191747.03696.lvillani () binaryhelix ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Thursday 19 February 2009 11:39:08 Thomas Zander wrote:
> [cut]
>
> If they use distro packages for kdelibs the chances are pretty good that
> that distro altered the dir to save settings in to something like ~/.kde4
On Fedora we only have ~/.kde even if we ship some kde3 applications (like 
koffice 1.6). We only have a partial kde3 environment but no duplication. That's 
why we are going to ship KOffice 1.6 _or_ KOffice 2.0. Here's the question: to 
ship it (KOffice 2) or not to ship it on Fedora?

Here are the alternatives:
- Postpone KOffice 2 packages to F12 (to be released at the end of the year) and 
maybe add KOffice 2 packages to kde-redhat repository (maintained by the SIG)
- Ship KOffice 2 now (and maybe loose some user because of missing applications 
or lack of features)

It's a difficult decision, I know, but we must take the best one before F11 gets 
released.

-- 
Regards
  Lorenzo Villani                                   Mobile: (+39) 34 00 88 42 49
  http://www.binaryhelix.net              http://people.binaryhelix.net/lvillani
  GPG KeyID: 1024D/513BDC5C -- F348 B0B4 43C4 B4BB 0D8B 3612 72FE 265D 513B DC5C
  SSH (RSA) Fingerprint:         0e:4d:d2:3f:4a:f0:9e:f9:a5:e6:26:05:71:a0:3c:ce
  IRC Nicknames:                      FreeNode (irc.freenode.net:6667): lvillani

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]