[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: time to move on to qt44
From:       Girish Ramakrishnan <girish () forwardbias ! in>
Date:       2008-05-13 15:35:16
Message-ID: 4829B264.4050004 () forwardbias ! in
[Download RAW message or body]

Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 May 2008, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
>> On Monday 12 May 2008, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
>>> ok, sounds logical. Thanks for that samples. Well, maybe we can ask what
>>> Cryille and boud are thinking here (cause you named Krita *g*) and if I
>>> am the only one with a bad feeling here then just do it :)
>> Personally, I'm on 4.4 (that is, qt-copy) already because with earlier Qt
>> versions Krita has lots of problems.  In the end of course, before we can
>> release the first beta, we need to require Qt 4.4. I would like to move on;
>> however, if moving to 4.4 impedes the fantastic progress you and Pierre are
>> making even a little, let's not do it. The ODF stuff is _the_ most critical
>> path we have.
>
> Btw, is Girish on holiday?

Nope, just very very quiet :-) My internet is really really bad for the 
past 1-2 weeks and I am unable to submit anything :-( My ISP is working 
hard on the case, so I should be back in action in a couple of days.

That said, I am for requiring 4.4 too. There are lots of features in Qt 
4.4 that is required for reasonable ODF text support. Also, some of the 
ODF features I am adding, already require 4.5 (I have sent patches for 
Qt to Thomas). I test all my submits to KOffice with qt-copy (4.4), 
never with 4.3.

Girish
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]