[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: Formula Shape - Inferred rows
From:       Martin Pfeiffer <hubipete () gmx ! net>
Date:       2007-07-19 16:44:52
Message-ID: 200707191844.52983.hubipete () gmx ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wednesday 18 July 2007 21:00:11 Alfredo Beaumont wrote:
> Az, 2007eko Uztren 18a(e)an, Martin Pfeiffer(e)k idatzi zuen:
> > > > I have reverted it a pair of times already, because it has not been
> > > > proven to work. The real problem I see is that currently KFormula is
> > > > full of unfinished or broken code and I am unable to avoid this to
> > > > increase. I cannot see a clear line of work I can feel confortable
> > > > with. I think you have a much better idea of the design of the app
> > > > and where it's going and I think you should take over KFormula's
> > > > maintainership.
> > >
> > > Any news on this ?
> >
> > Well I am quite unsure. First I don't want to be the reason for you to
> > give up KFormula maintainership, so I would step back and let you develop
> > on it.
>
> It's just a matter of responsability. You have an opinion on the topic and
> I do have another one. When you said you would do it and went on you
> already took informally the responsability. Since this is quite spreadily
> happening, I just want you to assume that responsability formally. That
> doesn't mean I won't continue developing when or where I feel confortable.
>
> > Second I would actually vote for a removal of the KFormula application
> > and just develop the shape so that the maintainer question is senseless.
>
> This is something I'm not against, but unrelated. Someone should be in
> charge of it, be it called KFormula or FormulaShape, and I think that
> person is you.
>
> Cheers.

Ok so I will take over the responsibility! Cheers :)
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]