[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: Formula Shape - Inferred rows
From:       Alfredo Beaumont <alfredo.beaumont () gmail ! com>
Date:       2007-07-18 19:00:11
Message-ID: 200707182100.12049.alfredo.beaumont () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Az, 2007eko Uztren 18a(e)an, Martin Pfeiffer(e)k idatzi zuen:
> > > I have reverted it a pair of times already, because it has not been
> > > proven to work. The real problem I see is that currently KFormula is
> > > full of unfinished or broken code and I am unable to avoid this to
> > > increase. I cannot see a clear line of work I can feel confortable
> > > with. I think you have a much better idea of the design of the app and
> > > where it's going and I think you should take over KFormula's
> > > maintainership.
> >
> > Any news on this ?
>
> Well I am quite unsure. First I don't want to be the reason for you to give
> up KFormula maintainership, so I would step back and let you develop on it.

It's just a matter of responsability. You have an opinion on the topic and I 
do have another one. When you said you would do it and went on you already 
took informally the responsability. Since this is quite spreadily happening, 
I just want you to assume that responsability formally. That doesn't mean I 
won't continue developing when or where I feel confortable.

> Second I would actually vote for a removal of the KFormula application and
> just develop the shape so that the maintainer question is senseless.

This is something I'm not against, but unrelated. Someone should be in charge 
of it, be it called KFormula or FormulaShape, and I think that person is you.

Cheers.
-- 
Alfredo Beaumont Sainz
http://www.alfredobeaumont.org/blog.cgi
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]