[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: Looking ahead for further alpha releases
From:       Thomas Zander <zander () kde ! org>
Date:       2007-05-14 13:08:53
Message-ID: 200705141508.53266.zander () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Monday 14 May 2007 14:16:20 Casper Boemann wrote:
> > this is optional, really, especially that they are some issues that
> > are currently not plan to be addressed by google summer of code, like
> > conflict, and we can't release it with conflict.
>
> Hmm right, but still it's set exactly here because this is the point
> where we should decide wether it should be in or not

You mean that the plugin that does this should not be shipped if its not 
fully functional?

> > all application needs that, and I quiet like the kde4 schedule on
> > that aspect, doing the UI review after the feature freeze.
>
> You cant change ui radically after freeze so that would be a bad time
> to do i

What kind of freeze are you thinking about, then?
KDE has a 'no new libraries' freeze, a 'API cleanup/renaming' freeze, a 
feature freeze and a string freeze. (IIRC).

-- 
Thomas Zander

[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]