[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: [patch] Make LEFT() and RIGHT() closer to spec.
From:       Brad Hards <bradh () frogmouth ! net>
Date:       2006-12-18 19:39:25
Message-ID: 200612190639.30147.bradh () frogmouth ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Monday 18 December 2006 22:39, Stefan Nikolaus wrote:
> Yes, looks good, except the not existing, hence superfluous, "optional"
> attribute in the description. I started a new XML schema once (located in
> koffice/kspread/functions) to cover those and to provide us a way to
> validate the descriptions, but it's neither discussed nor finished yet.
There are a few other functions that use it (I assumed it was "going to be 
implemented"). Should I remove those too?

Brad

[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]