[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: Kexi manuals - trying to clear up
From:       Anne-Marie Mahfouf <annemarie.mahfouf () free ! fr>
Date:       2005-11-21 0:59:26
Message-ID: 200511201959.27382.annemarie.mahfouf () free ! fr
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi,

I just did not understand what was asked from me. And I thought svn was about 
working together easily. 
No harm done, I reversed to a revision before I did any change so it's all 
back as you left it. I won't interfere again, it happens that people don't 
understand what their role is meant to be. 
Sorry about that, :-(

Anne-Marie

On Friday 01 April 2005 20:00, Martin Ellis wrote:
> [Sun Nov 20 2005] [20:49:27]
> <[raphael]> hi annma, what happened with Kexi? was there any
> misunderstanding of what to do?
> ...
> <annma> I did not get at all what I was to do
> <annma> the best for them would be to draw a plan first
>
> OK, so there was definitely some confusion going on....
> but I certainly have a plan.  Here's my take:
>
> We have some text translated from Polish, but some of it doesn't read very
> well, so I want to rewrite some parts:
>
> [Thu Nov 17 2005] [16:20:36]
> <annma> but for content I'll be stuck
> <mart> well, we already have some text, it just needs rewriting a bit.
>
> But since there's no way Anne-Marie was going to guess what the plan was, I
> wanted to tell her first, to avoid the "too many cooks" problem:
>
> [Thu Nov 17 2005] [16:28:07]
> <mart> ok, it's not online, and there are I'd like to tell you which bits
> should be left out/moved in the final version
>
> Unfortunately, I didn't get around to sending "the plan" fast enough, and
> Anne-Marie went ahead with docbooking and trampled over my newly written
> text (which in retrospect is fair enough, it's presumably what she
> understood the plan to be).
>
> Cue me emailing annma, less than pleased.  Sorry, I just got frustrated -
> from the quotes above I thought we were understanding each other.
>
>
> Anyway.  Jaroslaw would like to get the TOC into the docs in subversion as
> soon as possible.  Me too - this'll make it easier for more than one person
> to work on it at the same time.   This is my next task.
>
> As for too having too many appendices - I don't think we will.  Regardless,
> we can always move the 'questionable' ones into the body of the manual
> later. I've been trying to keep the structure similar to the KWord and
> KSpread manuals - and the KWord manual has a chapter for 'Fundamentals' so
> it may move back eventually.
>
> Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> koffice-devel mailing list
> koffice-devel@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]