[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: esstix fonts and KFormula
From:       Raphael Langerhorst <raphael-langerhorst () gmx ! at>
Date:       2005-01-18 4:13:53
Message-ID: 200501180513.55070.raphael-langerhorst () gmx ! at
[Download RAW message or body]

On Friday 14 January 2005 22:02, Raphael Langerhorst wrote:
> On Friday 14 January 2005 21:29, Nicolas Goutte wrote:
> > On Friday 14 January 2005 13:38, Richard Lärkäng wrote:
> > (...)
> >
> > > And also it has a patch for fixing the reporting of missing
> > > fonts, and trying to choose a default font that works. I never
> > > got an ok to commit that, so is it ok to commit now?
> >
> > That is the problem when nobody is the maintainer of an
> > application.
> >
> > But if you think that the patch goes in the right direction, then
> > do it. It cannot be more broken than now, can it?
>
> I FINALLY got some fonts working (the Tex, thanks to Rex Dieter).
> Still, KFormula complained that it couldn't load the fonts altough
> it could. And I guess even the Symbol font doesn't yet work.
>
> So almost anything is broken right now regarding fonts in KFormula.
> If things improve with the patch, please commit. I will also check
> back on KFormula as soon as your patch is in to look for
> regressions (no time to patch and test at the moment or tomorrow).
>

I just tested Kformula yesterday, Tex font recognition now works 
without error output (I don't have Symbol or Esstix, and so they both 
still give errors, which is correct as well).

So thanks again for improving this,
Raphael
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]