[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: [PATCH] underlines in RTF import
From:       Nicolas Goutte <nicolasg () snafu ! de>
Date:       2003-09-01 9:31:39
[Download RAW message or body]

On Monday 01 September 2003 10:12, Ewald Snel wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
(...)
>
> > However, I have still a little problem: strikeout. There too exist two
> > keywords: \strike and \striked. So is the current implementation wrong
> > too? Do we need an enum there too?
>
> I think so, although the following RTF code executed on OpenOffice assumes
> that \strike0 and \striked0 both turn of any strike through. The spec
> doesn't mention that \striked0 can turn off \strike too. This wil require
> yet another function (setStrikeProperty).
>
> 	\strike strike\striked0  no strike
> 	\striked strike\strike0  no strike

I have found the answer in the meantime. They are independent.

However it seems that \striked is the exception. It needs \striked1 to turn 
on. (I suppose that this is to avoid to trigger a bug in some RTF reader.) 

>
> > Have a nice day!
>
> Thanks.
> bye,
>
> ewald

Have a nice day!

>
> _______________________________________________
> koffice-devel mailing list
> koffice-devel@mail.kde.org
> http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel

_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]