[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: KWord and bitmap fonts
From:       Nicolas Goutte <nicog () snafu ! de>
Date:       2002-07-24 20:06:15
[Download RAW message or body]

On Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2002 13:08, Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
> Dne út 23. červenec 2002 01:06 Nicolas Goutte napsal(a):
> > On Montag, 22. Juli 2002 23:21, Thomas Zander wrote:
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > On Monday 22 July 2002 23:10, Nicolas Goutte wrote:
> > > > On Montag, 22. Juli 2002 09:50, Thomas Zander wrote:
> > > > > On Monday 22 July 2002 01:54, Nicolas Goutte wrote:
(...)
> > Why? Because the type 1 font is typically ISO-8859-1. (Well at least the
> > ones that I am using.) So the range outside ISO-8859-1 is composed by QT
> > with the help of other fonts. However on a typical
> > (old/default/non-TrueType) XFree system, the only Unicode font is
> > Clearlyu, which is a bitmap font!
>
> No, at least ISO-8859-2 is fully covered by the same Type1 fonts.

When I look at my file /usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/fonts.dir, I see that some 
fonts are only declared as ISO-8859-1, while some others are also declared as 
ISO-8859-2, -3 or -9. Still some others have additionally -4 and -15.

So some Type 1 fonts contain also the ISO-8859-2 characters, however some 
(like Utopia) do not.

In any case, no one of the fonts have non-latin characters, which is what I 
meant. However, I should have written outside ISO-8859, which would have been 
more precise.

>
(...)

Have a nice day/evening/night!
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]