[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: Nested Classes in msword filter
From:       Nicolas Goutte <nicog () snafu ! de>
Date:       2002-01-29 21:31:08
[Download RAW message or body]

KDE uses namespaces, so you can assume that it is portable for KDE.

Old C++ compilers do not have namespaces but they are lacking also newer key 
C++ features like templates.

As for classes in classes, I am not sure, but I think that it is quite the 
same. If the compiler can do namespaces, it can do classes in classes.

May be someone else knows it better than I do.

Have a nice day/evening/night!

On Tuesday 29 January 2002 01:23, Clarence Dang wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I noticed that the msword filter has class declarations nested within a
> class (msworgenerated). Is there a reason why a namespace wasn't used
> instead?
> Are both of them portable?
>
> Thanks!
> Clarence
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]