[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: koffice
Subject: Re: What is Kformula's status?
From: Cristian Tibirna <ctibirna () total ! net>
Date: 2000-02-27 21:00:56
[Download RAW message or body]
On Sun, 27 Feb 2000, David Faure wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 05:02:46PM +0000, C Y wrote:
> > Does anyone know what the current status of Kformula is? The web page on
> > http://koffice.kde.org for Kformula hasn't been updated in some time. Is it
> > still at 0.0.1? Will it be included in the KDE 2.0 release? Sorry if I'm
> > missing something, but this component would be important for most of my uses
> > of a word processor, as I am a physics major and equations are part of the
> > game. I can't find a feature list either, so I'm really in the dark as to
> > what it is supposed to be capable of. Anybody have any info?
> >
> > (Oh, incidently, from what I have seen, KOffice is going to rock the linux
> > world when it reaches 1.0. Great work guys!)
>
> KFormula is now a library (in kdelibs), not a Part anymore (i.e.
> not a standalone application nor a KOffice component).
>
> And KSpread and KWord make use of it already.
>
> Try them :)
Yeah, this situation passed a bit unobserver, and I believe it's a pity.
KFormula *has* to be a part IMHO. KPresenter looses 60% of its usefulness
without a formula part. And no, including a kword part just for a formula
doesn't cut it, IMHO. Am I wrong?
Cristian Tibirna
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic