[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: koffice
Subject: [Bug 142196] ooosvn for revision control
From: Sebastian Sauer <mail () dipe ! org>
Date: 2007-02-28 3:02:34
Message-ID: 20070228030234.9372.qmail () ktown ! kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142196
mail dipe org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
------- Additional Comments From mail dipe org 2007-02-28 04:02 -------
So, let's mark this wish as WONTFIX for now since the current OOoSVN-implementation just looks like \
OOo-only. If anybody does not agree there, please feel free to reopen the wish + provide some more \
details why I am wrong with my opinion. If it's all about getting a "joint effort" established to provide \
a solution other Office-suites like KOffice are able to use, then I would suggest to start first to \
define how such a solution needs to look like (e.g. what language, how to let apps access the \
functionality, maybe implement a lib? and what is the advantage compared to use the libsvn direct - e.g. \
provide support for more backends then only subversion? etc.). So, as sayed, I absolut like the idea to \
have here a solution that could be used by much more apps and it's a very good idea! I just don't see how \
it could be done with the current implementation :-( ____________________________________
koffice mailing list
koffice@kde.org
To unsubscribe please visit:
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic