From koffice Wed Feb 28 03:02:34 2007 From: Sebastian Sauer Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 03:02:34 +0000 To: koffice Subject: [Bug 142196] ooosvn for revision control Message-Id: <20070228030234.9372.qmail () ktown ! kde ! org> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=koffice&m=117263179513068 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142196 mail dipe org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From mail dipe org 2007-02-28 04:02 ------- So, let's mark this wish as WONTFIX for now since the current OOoSVN-implementation just looks like OOo-only. If anybody does not agree there, please feel free to reopen the wish + provide some more details why I am wrong with my opinion. If it's all about getting a "joint effort" established to provide a solution other Office-suites like KOffice are able to use, then I would suggest to start first to define how such a solution needs to look like (e.g. what language, how to let apps access the functionality, maybe implement a lib? and what is the advantage compared to use the libsvn direct - e.g. provide support for more backends then only subversion? etc.). So, as sayed, I absolut like the idea to have here a solution that could be used by much more apps and it's a very good idea! I just don't see how it could be done with the current implementation :-( ____________________________________ koffice mailing list koffice@kde.org To unsubscribe please visit: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice