[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice
Subject:    [Bug 142196] ooosvn for revision control
From:       Sebastian Sauer <mail () dipe ! org>
Date:       2007-02-28 3:02:34
Message-ID: 20070228030234.9372.qmail () ktown ! kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142196         
mail dipe org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX



------- Additional Comments From mail dipe org  2007-02-28 04:02 -------
So, let's mark this wish as WONTFIX for now since the current OOoSVN-implementation \
just looks like OOo-only. If anybody does not agree there, please feel free to reopen \
the wish + provide some more details why I am wrong with my opinion. If it's all \
about getting a "joint effort" established to provide a solution other Office-suites \
like KOffice are able to use, then I would suggest to start first to define how such \
a solution needs to look like (e.g. what language, how to let apps access the \
functionality, maybe implement a lib? and what is the advantage compared to use the \
libsvn direct - e.g. provide support for more backends then only subversion? etc.). \
So, as sayed, I absolut like the idea to have here a solution that could be used by \
much more apps and it's a very good idea! I just don't see how it could be done with \
the current implementation :-( ____________________________________
koffice mailing list
koffice@kde.org
To unsubscribe please visit:
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]