[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice
Subject:    Re: KFormula
From:       Boudewijn Rempt <boud () valdyas ! org>
Date:       2005-12-23 11:38:42
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.53.0512231238030.14969 () calcifer ! valdyas ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Alejandro Exojo wrote:

> El Jueves, 22 de Diciembre de 2005 18:29, Raphael Langerhorst escribi=F3:
> > I think it's really great that you want to help polish KFormula. In my
> > opinion KFormula is a component that is "completed" in a basic way, it =
does
> > what people expect it to do. But I do agree that it could use - or even
> > needs - some polishing.
>
> Wow, that really surprises me. Few applications can be tagged as "more or=
 less
> completed". And last time I tried (about a month ago), kformula still lac=
ked
> the support for OpenDocument, which I suppose is a must have for 1.5. And=
 the
> generated MathML has the problems I mentioned (some basic functions, as
> limits and trigonometric, doesn't exist, so it seems that "sin" is "s=B7i=
=B7n",
> which has a very different MathML output).

Good point :-).

> There is a lot of code in the koffice subdirectory, but if you really thi=
nk
> it's possible to do some stuff without reading most of it, I can try duri=
ng
> the winter holidays.

It's quite possible, although it may be wise to read the OASIS stuff in kof=
fice
libs.

Boudewijn


____________________________________
koffice mailing list
koffice@kde.org
To unsubscribe please visit:
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]