[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice
Subject:    Re: KDE does not recognice KWord docs
From:       Nicolas Goutte <nicolasg () snafu ! de>
Date:       2003-09-27 18:31:34
[Download RAW message or body]

On Saturday 27 September 2003 20:25, Nicolas Goutte wrote:
> On Saturday 27 September 2003 19:44, Thomas Zander wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 01:22:38PM +0200, Nicolas Goutte wrote:
> > > Then I suppose that you can add a second set. I would document why
> > > there are two sets, before someone deletes again one of them.
> >
> > Added.
> >
> > THis kzip thing; is it KDe or KOffice. And is the new koffice able to run
> > with kde 3.1 branch?
>
> It is part of KDE. KZip 3.1 will simply generate "fat"-based data, KZip 3.2
> will give "unx" ones.
>
> The problem is that the problemthat you got will happen for user of KOffice
> 1.2.x on KDE 3.1.x.

I meant "The problem is that you got..." Sorry!

>
> > In other words; is it useful to backport the additions for a kde 3.1.5 ?
>
> No, sure. I cannot remember if KOffice 1.2.x had its own KZip (named KoZip)

I meant "Not sure"

> or not. So I do not know if the change has to be done if KDE 3.1.x or in
> KOffice 1.2.x.
>
> But in any case, I am really starting to ask me if for the last KOffice-own
> file format it is useful to have again a subtle change. However this would
> mean to force KZip 3.2 to be able to write in the "fat" modus, either on
> command or simply for uncompressed files.
>
> Have a nice day!
> ____________________________________
> koffice mailing list
> koffice@mail.kde.org
> To unsubscribe please visit:
> http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice

____________________________________
koffice mailing list
koffice@mail.kde.org
To unsubscribe please visit:
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]