[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice
Subject:    Re: Fwd: formulas in kword!
From:       <vailima () chilitech ! net>
Date:       2003-05-06 12:14:28
[Download RAW message or body]


The original msg came across as one from a user, not a developer. No offense \
intended. :-)





> 
> Subject: Re: Fwd: formulas in kword!
> From: David Faure <dfaure@klaralvdalens-datakonsult.se>
> Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 10:59:46 +0200
> To: For discussion about KOffice <koffice@mail.kde.org>
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Monday 05 May 2003 18:35, vailima@chilitech.net wrote:
> > Mr. Faure;
> > 
> > Just read your posting, and perhaps this may be of some help, perhaps late but \
> > still, and hopefully of some help. 
> > 
> > From the sound of it, it appears that you've lost some files; i.e., can't be read \
> > by the current OS or word processing files which came with it. While new to the \
> > world of LINUX but one with long experience in the worlf of MS/DOS and Windows, \
> > you might want to consider employing the following: 
> > If you are using a specific word processor type (spread sheets and the like are \
> > also included in this suggestion) after you save the given work, re-save it in \
> > ASCII (aka the "text" format). Use the same name but save it in *.txt. If and for \
> > any reason you change, for example, word processors, at this point in time I'm \
> > not aware of any (LINUX or MS based) word processors which will not ul an ASCII \
> > file. The same applies of spread sheets; know of any spread sheets which will not \
> > ul CSV (Coma Seperated Values) spread sheet files?  
> > As for you're finding out that in LINUX, the newer file upgrades as offered along \
> > with a given new OS upgrade will not read files generated by comparable software, \
> > identical software which is only one version behind that which you;ve so recently \
> > upgraded to, this is not the first I've heard of this when dealing with LINUX - \
> > and in that regard, and no matter how well intended, I for one do not fully trust \
> > LINUX developers; keep in mind most LINUX programmers are "volunteers" as opposed \
> > to paid professionals writing for MS based files. 
> > Best of luck to you and hopefully this was of some help :-)
> 
> Very funny :)
> 
> I think you're confusing the users and the developers here...
> 
> - -- 
> David Faure -- faure@kde.org, dfaure@klaralvdalens-datakonsult.se
> Qt/KDE/KOffice developer
> Klarälvdalens Datakonsult AB, Platform-independent software solutions
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQE+t3mC72KcVAmwbhARAqpWAJwLPji7/+M2niqICBDPy/5brxbppQCgi5ye
> nCOLxmLVVuUHZ1R31yTSNys=
> =5aD9
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> ____________________________________
> koffice mailing list
> koffice@mail.kde.org
> To unsubscribe please visit:
> http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice

____________________________________
koffice mailing list
koffice@mail.kde.org
To unsubscribe please visit:
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]