[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: KMail User Interface
From:       Ingo =?iso-8859-1?q?Kl=F6cker?= <ingo.kloecker () epost ! de>
Date:       2001-05-31 23:06:47
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday, 31. May 2001 12:31, Andreas Gungl wrote:
> Marc Mutz wrote:
> > + my topfolder (0)
> >   + my subfolder (2)
> >     + my-longest-folder-name (25)
>
>         + a-very-very-long-and-unreadable-folder-name (48)
>
> > + my topfolder                                       0
> >   + my subfolder                                     2
> >     + my-longest-folder-name                        25
>
>         + a-very-very-long-and-unreadable-folder-name 48
>
> High Marc,
>
> in which of the two cases can you detect the number of new messages
> for the "my subfolder" easier? I'ld prefer the first one.

Good example, Andreas.
I can live with not seeing the number of unread messages of the folder 
with the very, very long name because the name is displayed in bold if 
it contains new messages. But I don't want not to be able to see the 
number of unread messages for all the other folders (with shorted 
names) just because one folder has a very long name. This is why I 
prefer the way the "unread" number is currently displayed in KMail.

Regards,
Ingo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7Fs6HGnR+RTDgudgRArwJAKCMEmpyoB/elIEghazVm+ItuZO4pACeJ6yq
sLyXQ9gX9GITr2iA+el1pbI=
=JhWK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Kmail Developers mailing list
Kmail@master.kde.org
http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]