[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: Welcome to KMail!
From:       Ingo =?iso-8859-1?q?Kl=F6cker?= <ingo.kloecker () epost ! de>
Date:       2001-05-30 20:54:26
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday, 29. May 2001 12:18, Andreas Gungl wrote:
> Marc Mutz wrote:
> > kdebase isn't optional, but mandatory, since it contains the pop3
> > and impa4 kiosalves.
>
> Mandatory to use KMail, but if you want to test the compilation of
> your (PGP) patches with the current version of KMail resp.
> libkdenetwork, then you won't need kdebase.

I never noticed that I might need kdebase although I use the current 
cvs version of KMail all the time. To be honest I never compiled cvs 
kdebase. But as I neither use pop3 nor imap4 this is no problem for me. 
I get all my mail via fetchmail from the servers and then read it with 
KMail from the local mailbox.

> Ingo was talking about four packages instead of about the whole KDE.
> Often I update only kdenetwork - as long as no change in kdelibs
> requires a recompilation of kdebase plus the above mentioned
> packages. And those small updates are really fast while my machine is
> some hours busy running make for these four packages.

Exactly. Even after not updating kdelibs or kdebase for a week it only 
takes a few minutes to update to the current versions (via ISDN).

Regards,
Ingo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7FV4CGnR+RTDgudgRAqddAJ99FjUlPEb4ZcJBai2yIqsrZJ5WBQCeOm9b
gbrNjv+V63cYspDuTA93s2Q=
=0fv1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Kmail Developers mailing list
Kmail@master.kde.org
http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]