[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kmail-devel
Subject: Re: A few thoughts concerning Kmail and GnuPGP...
From: Ingo =?iso-8859-1?q?Kl=F6cker?= <ingo.kloecker () epost ! de>
Date: 2001-05-28 22:21:03
[Download RAW message or body]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, 26. May 2001 00:43, Darian Lanx wrote:
> Even though, this is a dual Pentium III 933 with 1 Gig Ram, kmail
> seems very slow when verifing signatures of mails. I do not know, if
> that is the fault of my gpg 1.0.5 or kmail, but I wanted to mention
> it.
Is it faster with GnuPG 1.0.4? Also having much keys in your keyring
can slow down GnuPG very much.
> When Kmail verifies the signature of a mail, the GUI blocks, and does
> not redraw until the verification has run. THis is especially then a
> problem, when I wish to simply progress without reading the mail, for
> example, when I have clicked on it accidentally in a mailing list
> folder.
Making the automatic signature verification configurable is on my todo
list. Non-blocking signature verification would also be nice.
> Messages, which originate from me (for example to a mailing list) are
> also checked for valid signature. Sometimes I do click on my own mail
> in a thread of a mailing list to read up what I have written and
> others have replied. Would it be possible, to make checking of the
> signature for messages which obviously originate from me, optional?
Maybe I'll implement this.
> Verification of signatures is not cached. If I, by accident, or maybe
> on purpouse click on the same message again, after reading another
> mail, the message is again verified, which means, Kmail vlocks until
> that has happened, etc etc. When reading about 20-500 mails a day
> with about 50% encrypted, that can be quite time consuming.
> I do not know if it possible, but caching of already verified mails
> would be nice. when I click on it again, it is simpyl shown as
> verified, maybe until I close Kmail.
Yeah, caching would be nice. Maybe we could save the state of the
signature verification to the index files. Caching of decrypted
messages is IMHO a bad idea because of security reasons and because of
memory consumption.
> Thank you for listening to me.
Thanks for your suggestions.
Regards,
Ingo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7Es9QGnR+RTDgudgRAu94AJ9mTiCrdwYLvGfX8Qc4X2A8mZ6oxwCg4B9w
r95bszzJpbv39XsDxur5ZZg=
=02y3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Kmail Developers mailing list
Kmail@master.kde.org
http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic