[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: settings "OK"
From:       Espen Sand <espen.sand () neo ! no>
Date:       2000-08-09 6:05:33
[Download RAW message or body]

At 03:31 PM 8/7/00 -0400, you wrote:
>Uh...
>
>    Yeah.... That was a bug!  

Well perhaps. I made it like that in the first place because I 
prefer to do as few changes to the program state as possible
(it takes time to set every preference). But I know about the 
problems with this method as well.

A more advanced solution is to mark the visited pages as dirty
and only save the contents of those pages. That should reduce
the amount of preference data that will have to be set each time.


>
>--Matthew
>
>>>> dnaber@mini.gt.owl.de 08/05/00 10:00AM >>>
>Hi,
>
>I just commited this change:
>
>If you press "OK" in the settings dialog, all changes will take effect, not
>only those of the current tab. Don, I'm not sure if you were against this. 
>I think you compared the dialog to kcontrol. But the difference is that
>our dialog completely closes when you press "OK". So I think the new 
>behaviour is better (and the old behaviour was submitted as a bug, 7017).
>
>Regards
> Daniel
>
>
>

--
Espen Sand

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]