[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: Feature Request
From:       Steve <sa.allen () home ! com>
Date:       2000-04-27 14:54:53
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Don Sanders wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Stefan Taferner wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Apr 2000, Steve wrote:
> > > On Tue, 25 Apr 2000, Stefan Taferner wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 22 Apr 2000, Steve wrote:


> > > Sure, a "switch" so that in list view  unread mail is not mixed up
> > > with read mail.  List view can become very cluttered - I like to see
> > > only my unread e-mail in my mail folder, but still have my read mail
> > > viewable by using a toggle switch.
> > >
> > > Does Kmail already have this feature?
> > 
> > You mean like clicking on the column header of the column with the status 
> > icons?   ;-)
> 
> Alternatively he might mean something like Outlook express' "hide read
> messages" option (which does not display read messages in the headers list).

Exactly - that's what I meant. 
 
> > Unfortunately we have to rethink this concept for threaded message
> > lists, however.  
> 
> Probably hiding read messages in threaded message list view could be made to
> work. Actually I should mention several bugs in threaded message view have
> cropped up and I have been working on them.
> 
> > Well, maybe we can have one column where the status flags are combined with 
> > the sender field for threaded mode, and separated columns in non-threaded 
> > mode?   (this paragraph is meant for the kmail developers :-)
> 
> Actually I can't see how that would help to be honest. 
..
-- 
/Steve
  
   

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]