[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: TODO List (Rivyn's duplicate copy ideas)
From:       Stefan Taferner <taferner () salzburg ! co ! at>
Date:       2000-03-22 7:43:43
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Don Sanders wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Stefan Taferner wrote:
> > > Don Sanders wrote:
> > > New addressbook
> >
> > Yep.  Anybody willing to integrate kab properly?
>
> I have written my own address book and will integrate this. I don't have
> anything against kab being integrated in addition to this, I'm just not
> that motivated to d it.

Ok, fine for me :-)

> > > Index file needs reply to and this id
> >
> > Gaining what?
> >
> > IMO we would need the Message-id and the References field (for
> > threading) instead.
>
> Oops, um that's what I meant :-)

;-)

> > >   (Threading maybe not hard to do but maybe hard to get just right)
> >
> > Requires said fields in the index IMO.
>
> Right.

I have some concept on how to write threading. Maybe I find a little time
to do it.

> > >  (IMAP unrealistic in near future)
> >
> > Mostly there in kdenonbeta/libkmsg. Unfortunately I do not have time yet
> > to port it to kmail. Hopefully in a couple of weeks / months :-|
>
> Ok, I should take a look. I'm hoping you'll have more free time in the
> future to devote to KMail.

Same for me (I mean I am hoping too) .... sigh ;-)

> I plan to write some high level documentation (of the code) for KMail in
> the not to distant future, hopefully that will make it easier to see what
> I've done and why I've done it.
>
> > IMO you forgot a point:
> >
> > automatically sync index changes to folder contents so that nothing is
> > lost when the index is deleted.
>
> Right, I see. I think I'll treat that as a feature rather than a bug. (I'm
> giving bugs a higher priority).

Ok :-)

Kind regards,
Stefan

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]