[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: New config dialog
From:       George Staikos <staikos () 0wned ! org>
Date:       2000-03-19 18:17:39
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Sun, 19 Mar 2000, Don Sanders wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Robert D. Williams wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Don Sanders wrote:
> > > Yes exactly speed isn't important, just the popular options should be
> > > easy to find for KMail newbies. Actually I'm thinking long folder list
> > > should be on by default (didn't someone else say that?) so perhaps there
> > > wouldn't be a problem in that case.
> >
> > I think it was me ;-)  We need long folder list as the default.   So much
> > better than the alternative.
> 
> Hmm, I definitely prefer long folder too. But as some people (Espen at least) 
> like short folder I don't feel completely sure about changing the default.

  In high res with lots of folders, long list is better.
  In lower res, regardless of the number of folders, I find short list is
better.  It's hard to fit even the header of an email in at 800x600 with long
list.  even 1024x768 isn't fun.  I'd have to say long list is more of a
1280x1024 or better thing (although I'm sure many of you will argue that)

- -- 

George Staikos 


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.2

iQEVAwUBONUaD/aardfOEhQRAQG9uQf/bEu+rGBb4fIjskeJ47RBWISb1PR97bqr
zIv68uJPyI7RS2YuIx4zyv1ktOO6mjD0jfEaAa6zon4NVQJRXyEATkBAL+vENjtj
vzAI7wOI+KDJ5ZbZneYB431Td5hs5aFoOOjzAnNmeObsrO372Kmh7n5It0Sizvqh
L0MljYTK2M/75ah8tVNCkTCbUlkMm4iyI1DzfiL0hjaNFksw8qaDs/rY33oC5Y0L
gBW6YB7LYYKEf3/nzGRuCZ9SkrKCyNalF3+yXCL+mSSaZ6kB+/ttNcBRx0ope7kg
ZRHbc+C/v7dpmk49vQvoIu8VlBAaSdz/+cZ6+aGd9ndhuO6pQc7kyA==
=uAvR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]