[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: Patch: kill running jobs so that kmail exits
From:       Ingo =?iso-8859-1?q?Kl=F6cker?= <kloecker () kde ! org>
Date:       2004-04-27 21:16:51
Message-ID: 200404272316.52202 () erwin ! ingo-kloecker ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Tuesday 27 April 2004 22:53, David Faure wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 April 2004 21:59, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > You are only handling the case that it's the main window that's
> > closed. You don't handle the case that one of the secondary windows
> > (composer or message window) is closed as last window. At least, I
> > don't see why KMMainWin::queryExit() should be called in this case.
>
> Right, it's not.
> The question is what should happen?
> Should mail checking happen in the background of the composer window,
> or should be stopped when closing the last KMMainWin?
> My guess is for the latter - if we agree I can simply move the code
> to the destructor or closeEvent and check if there are any visible
> KMMainWin remaining in the static window list.

Hmm, you don't mention the system tray applet, but that's probably just 
an oversight. Also we sometimes have an invisible KMMainWin object in 
the kernel (or is this an invisible KMMainWidget object nowadays?). I 
don't know whether I should be for or against stopping mail checking 
when the last main window is closed. But I tend to agree with you.

Till or Carsten will have to comment on the IMAP related parts of the 
patch.

Regards,
Ingo

[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
KMail developers mailing list
KMail-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]