[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: Search Dialog
From:       Ingo =?iso-8859-1?q?Kl=F6cker?= <kloecker () kde ! org>
Date:       2004-01-08 19:40:25
Message-ID: 200401082040.34579 () erwin ! ingo-kloecker ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Wednesday 07 January 2004 23:45, Till Adam wrote:
> On Thursday 08 January 2004 01:22, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > Another improvement would be to only show the numerical comparison
> > operators (is greater than, etc.) for numerical fields, e.g. for
> > <size in bytes> and <age in days>. On the same time "contains",
> > etc. shouldn't be shown for numerical comparison. Also for <status>
> > only "is" and "is not" should be shown. With this approach the
> > comparison operator drop down box would already be less cluttered
> > even in expert mode. The only thing the expert mode would change is
> > showing/hiding the two reg.exp. options.
>
> For status "is" and "is not" is more often wrong than not. If a
> message is "read" and "important" then <status> "is" "read" will be
> false. Either we change the semantics of "is" and "is not" to mean
> "contains" and "doesn't contain" for status, or it has to be
> "contains" and not "is" that is available for status.

Well, yes, we have to change the semantics of "is" and "is not" for 
<status>. A message which is "read" and "important" is of course 
"read" (in common sense).

Regards,
Ingo

[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
KMail developers mailing list
KMail-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]