[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: [RFC] Reply behavior in KMail
From:       Martin Koller <m.koller () surfeu ! at>
Date:       2003-11-30 16:04:11
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Writing this mail b clicking on the "reply" button ...

> Sure. But this criticism is mostly based on two things:
> a) There was no Reply to Mailing-list icon on the default toolbar.
> b) People didn't know about Reply to Mailing-list (mainly due to a)).
>
> a) has been fixed by me in the meantime. So everone updating to KDE 3.2
> will notice the new icon, wonder why it's there, notice that Reply
> doesn't work anymore as before and start using Reply to Mailing-list
> (what they should have been using all the time for replying to
> mailing-list messages).

Hmm... I upgraded to 3.2 yesterday (used 3.1.4 before), and I'm currently 
using kontact, but I have no new icon in my iconbar ...

And if I try to "reply" to your mail, the To: address is not really different 
from the "Reply to mailing list"

Reply gives: kmail@kde.org
Reply to mailing list gives: kmail@mail.kde.org

I'm not a specialist what all the email headers concerns, but can you tell me, 
if that is correct, and if so, what's the difference?
(and if you think that's a question belonging to the general kde mailing list, 
ignore it and forgive me)

- -- 
Best regards/Schöne Grüße

Martin
registered as user #332716 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org

       Some operating systems are called 'user friendly',
             Linux however is 'expert friendly'.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE/yhT+HmdPoI37D4YRAq5YAJ0RTdyFbn2YNZUGoPXGD4bYtN303QCgqjRj
EEdAW0Qgv0ZZE4lBxtO+oII=
=hdUS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
KMail Developers mailing list
kmail@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]