[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: Ideas on Reply-To-List
From:       Andras Mantia <amantia () freemail ! hu>
Date:       2003-11-29 15:30:06
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Matej Cepl wrote:

> (sorry for breaking the thread)
> On Saturday 29 November 2003, Andras Mantia wrote:
>> Right? This breaks again consistency, if we talk about it.
>
> No, it doesn't because it follows standards, I mean real standards.
> Like RFC2919 and RFC2369. And that is what matters and not what some
> broken MUAs (and administrators trying to acommodate them) think.
>

Read the rest of the paragraph, where I talk that the consistency is broken
because the current Reply behavior depends on the Post Address you set in 
KMail folder properties. I don't think any RFC talks about it. ;-)

Andras

- --
Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.sourceforge.net
K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/yLt+TQdfac6L/08RAkc5AJ9b47xYr3YCaBIDpy27cPCMbNqGbQCfUv5G
UrMdaDXscVvVGMhym+qj6Ok=
=6rJb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
KMail Developers mailing list
kmail@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]