[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: CIA proposal (was: ClientInterface)
From:       Ingo =?iso-8859-1?q?Kl=F6cker?= <kloecker () kde ! org>
Date:       2003-07-24 23:11:43
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Thursday 24 July 2003 15:55, Marc Mutz wrote:
> On Thursday 24 July 2003 01:10, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > Since you propose to read/write DCOP ids to the lock file I assumed
> > that you wanted A to send the message to B via DCOP which doesn't
> > work if A and B are running on different machines.
>
> The client/server architecture has the same problem.

If you re-read my comments on the client/server proposal then you will 
notice that this was also one of my points of critisism of that 
proposal.

> CIA allows the non-compacting case without DCOP, so it has even an
> advantage there.

What about appending? What if two clients append at the same time? IMO 
locking is also necessary if one appends new messages to the index.

Regards,
Ingo


[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
KMail Developers mailing list
kmail@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]